Current Events

NATO positions for the first attack on Russian Federation

60 FEWER STORIES IN NOVEMBER DUE TO LOW FUNDS: WE NEED AND WELCOME DONATIONS TO KEEP US GOING: Please contact Michael Walsh for easy transfer details keyboardcosmetics@gmail.com

Moscow has expressed concerns about the concentration of Western alliance missile systems, troops, warships, and aircraft near Russia’s borders, and NATO’s decades’ long eastward expansion. This month, the Russian Foreign Ministry formally signalled that it considers Ukraine to be a red line for Moscow that NATO is strongly advised not to cross.

NATO is preparing for a large-scale armed conflict with Russia, in contravention of the Rome Declaration of 2002, Russian Deputy Defence Minister Alexander Fomin says.

‘The bloc’s military construction has been completely reorientated toward preparing for a large-scale, high-intensity armed conflict with Russia’, Fomin said at a diplomatic briefing of 105 foreign military attaches, including representatives of 14 NATO countries, in Moscow on Monday. Fomin pointed out that in recent doctrinal documents put out by the alliance, Russia is identified, ‘without any subtlety, as the main source of threats to alliance security.’

‘NATO conducts 30 major drills featuring scenarios for conducting military operations against Russia each year’, the high ranking officer said. ‘Within the framework of combat training activities, special attention is paid to the creation of strike groups near the borders of our country. In May and June of this year, the bloc held a series of drills known as Defender Europe-21, which involved the transfer of up to 40,000 troops from the United States and Western Europe toward the alliance’s eastern flank.

EU / UK FRIENDS CAN HELP US WITH A SIMPLE ONLINE TRANSFER TO OUR ACCOUNT keyboardcosmetics@gmail.com

Fomin further indicated that about 13,000 troops from other countries are stationed on NATO’s Eastern European members’ soil on a permanent basis, with these forces armed with over 600 tanks and armoured vehicles, dozens of heavy guns, and at least 30 planes and helicopters.

Quite unnecessary for defence. Besides, armaments are basically attack or defensive in their nature. The NATO military machine is specifically aggressive and useless in a defensive role.

‘Recently, the alliance has moved to the practice of direct provocations, fraught with a high risk of escalating into an armed confrontation’, the officer warned, recalling a June incident involving the HMS Defender destroyer’s attempted violation of Crimea’s maritime borders.

According to the deputy defence minister, NATO reconnaissance flights in the Black Sea jumped 60 per cent between 2020 and 2021, with US strategic bombers carrying out flights as close as 15 km off Crimea 92 times this year, compared with 78 times in 2020. The alliance has held 15 exercises in the Black Sea, compared with eight in 2020, Fomin said.

In the Baltic region, Fomin indicated that the alliance conducted over 1,200 aircraft sorties and over 50 naval reconnaissance missions, and over 20 operational and combat training events, some of them involving neutral states Sweden and Finland, which border on or are close to Russia. None could be regarded as defensive; all were probing Russia’s means of defence.

The deputy defence minister warned that NATO’s efforts to expand and strengthen its military infrastructure on its eastern flank have had a negative impact on the security architecture of the entire European continent and 450 million Europeans, but are only one of the multiple actions taken by the alliance over the decades to do so.

This and other waves of expansion significantly increased the alliance’s military potential on its eastern flank, he said, pointing out that NATO’s borders have moved over 1,000 km east since the end of the Cold War, providing the Western bloc with opportunities to use non-strategic weapons to strike targets inside Russia.

‘For example, the minimum flight time from airbases in Estonia to St. Petersburg has been reduced to several minutes. Most of the Kaliningrad region is within striking range of artillery systems alone. A significant number of pieces of infrastructure have been transferred to NATO’s disposal, expanding the possibility for the deployment and transfer of troops’, Fomin said.

The officer added that the bloc’s arsenal was beefed up considerably by weapons, vehicles, and personnel of the former Warsaw Pact members, plus new ports in the Baltic and Black Seas, and an expansion of NATO’s naval power.

Fomin stressed that this expansion and the growth of NATO’s potential was not provoked by the Russian Federation in any way, with Russian-Western relations in 1997, the year before the bloc’s eastward thrust began with the incorporation of the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary, describable as ‘cloudless’.

‘The Russian side reaffirmed its readiness to build up cooperation in all areas and at various levels which at that time seemed important from the point of view of European security. There were no challenges facing the alliance which required expansion, although after the reunification of Germany in 1990, the entire united country, including the former GDR, became a member of the alliance. Thus, the first step toward expansion was made. Later, new waves of NATO enlargement followed’, Fomin said.

It was also NATO, not Russia, which sparked the crisis in relations, the deputy defence minister suggested, pointing to the West’s support for the bloody coup in Kiev and the overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected government in February 2014, which was followed by the Crimean referendum and the start of the civil war in eastern Ukraine in the spring of that year.

The bloc has also systematically violated the terms of the Rome Declaration, including with its annual aerial drills training on the use of nuclear weapons, the construction of alliance military infrastructure in the Baltics starting in 2004, and the deployment of US Aegis Ashore missile defence facilities in Romania and Poland in 2016, Fomin said.

Russian officials have repeatedly warned that the universal Mk-41 launchers used by the Aegis Ashore facilities could easily be converted from anti-missile missiles to fire nuclear-capable Tomahawk cruise missiles with a 2,400 km range deep inside Russia.

NATO, according to Fomin, ‘has consistently ignored Russian interests, and shied away from conducting an equitable discussion of existing problems’, with Moscow thus forced to issue firm demands for security guarantees to rule out the further expansion of the alliance to the east, and/or the deployment of new weapons systems in the immediate vicinity of Russia’s borders.

Fomin emphasised that the Russian Defence Ministry, for its part, is prepared to begin negotiations with NATO on security guarantees at any moment, and looks forward to a serious, constructive conversation on proposals developed with the interests of both Russia and Europe as a whole in mind.

Experts comment that NATO seems to have decided to commit suicide. ‘If Western sociopaths launch an attack on Russia, the Russians should first of all take care to destroy the USA, since they are the source of hostility.’

Other comments: ‘I see no other way to defend Russia than to strike first, use the nuclear arsenal, strike all over Europe and the US instead of waiting for the worst. The Baltic states could be re-attached, as well as Ukraine, Georgia, etc. Don’t forget to target Norway and the Norwegians with their bad-smelling cod.’

A pundit writes: ‘NATO led by the US will stop at nothing to provoke conflicts to justify their existence, wake up EU citizens, they are not acting for your welfare, Russia is not the aggressor. Someone please use a little common sense and stop the cold war mentality.

Russian President Vladimir Putin remarked: ‘Any aggressor should know that retaliation will be inevitable and he will be destroyed. And because we will be the victims of his aggression, we will go to heaven as martyrs. They will simply drop dead before they even have time to repent’ – Vladimir Putin, October 2018. PLEASE SHARE OUR STORIES.

EU / UK FRIENDS CAN HELP US WITH A SIMPLE ONLINE TRANSFER TO OUR ACCOUNT keyboardcosmetics@gmail.com

Donate: It is the generosity of our supporters and members that makes our vital work possible. As the storm clouds of crisis and the pain of injustice and persecution loom over our people, the potential and importance of our work grows day-by-day. There is no George Soros figure out there for nationalists, so we can only do what good people like you help us to do. Thank you for your faith and your generous commitment: contact Michael Walsh euroman_uk@yahoo.co.uk

1 reply »

  1. If the U.S. and its NATO nitwit brigade poke the Bear, they will get what they deserve, a sound thrashing. The Americans and their Oligarch handlers have over-reached themselves, and if they continue, only Europeans will suffer.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s