Current Events

Goodbye empire? US sanctions are failing in the face of multipolarity


Washington’s gung-ho presumptions that it rules the world can’t prevent the rise of other powers, an influential establishment journal admits.

Foreign Affairs, a highly influential US magazine, effectively a US empire house journal, has published an article detailing how sanctions are rapidly losing their efficiency as a weapon in Washington’s global arsenal – indeed backfiring.

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations NGO, Foreign Affairs provides space for officials within the US military-industrial complex to communicate with one another on matters they believe to be of the utmost significance. Therefore, it is important to pay attention when the magazine makes major statements on any issue.

It recently published an appraisal of US sanctions, the conclusion being that they are increasingly ineffective. They have prompted Beijing and Moscow to create alternative global financial structures to insulate themselves and others from punitive actions. Washington and its acolytes will no longer be able to force countries to do their bidding, let alone destroy the economies of nonconforming states, through such measures in the very near future.

The article begins by noting that sanctions have long been the US-favored diplomatic weapon, which fill the void between empty diplomatic declarations and deadly military interventions. Despite this, it predicts ’the golden days of US sanctions may soon be over.

These golden days were the immediate post-Cold War era when Washington was still an abusive unrivaled economic power. Washington and Wall Street could at the press of a button cripple each and every overseas economy. This was due to the dominance of the US dollar and the reach of US oversight of global financial channels.

As international trade was overwhelmingly conducted using dollars, Washington could stop any country from exporting or importing any and all goods it wished, whenever it liked. Even then, Foreign Affairs recalls, US leaders themselves worried if sanctions were applied too liberally. In 1998, then-President Bill Clinton claimed his government was in danger of looking like we want to sanction everybody who disagrees with us.

The Foreign Affairs article says Clinton’s fears were overblown, but this is precisely what happened. Countries have been sanctioned for pursuing the wrong policies, refusing to be overthrown in US-backed coups and military interventions and showing any degree of independence in their domestic or foreign dealings whatsoever. In the process, an estimated 30 million have died since WWII. Even more lives have been ruined for no good reason.

This approach has backfired, and badly. In response, states have begun to harden their economies against such measures. For example, after the US cut off Iran from the SWIFT global banking system, many other countries took note. Restricting China’s access to numerous technologies as part of the new Cold War has also served to place both Washington’s allies and adversaries alike on notice their access to crucial technology could be severed.

Beijing and Moscow lead the way in the push to create financial innovations that diminish US advantage, creating a raft of currency swap agreements, alternatives to SWIFT, and digital currencies that serve as preemptive measures against any potential penalties down the line.

Currency swaps – in Hitler’s Germany called the barter system which cut out the banks – disconnects central banks and end the need for trade to be dollar-backed. China has signed deals of this kind with more than 60 countries across the world, thereby enabling its companies to circumvent US financial channels when they want to. 

In 2020, Beijing settled more than half its annual trade with Moscow in currencies other than the dollar, making the majority of these transactions immune to US sanctions. That figure has risen ever since. In March of that year also, the China and Russia-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization officially prioritized the development of payments in the local currencies of its members.

Beijing and Moscow are also, Foreign Affairs reports, busily preparing their own alternatives to various Western-dominated international systems. Their alternative to SWIFT, the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, isn’t yet a match in terms of volume, but that’s not the point. It prevents them, and any state or organization enrolled in the framework – 1,300 banks in over 100 countries already – from being unable to make international financial transactions, should they be cut out of SWIFT.

Similarly, China is expanding the reach of the digital renminbi, the currency issued by Beijing central bank, at home and overseas. More than 300 million of its citizens already use it, and a billion are forecast to by 2030. The currency is completely sanctions-proof as the US has no ability to prevent its use, and Beijing has encouraged several countries to pay for its exports exclusively using it – other such deals will probably follow, Foreign Affairs predicts. 

The American empire’s obsessive reliance on sanctions has now created a Catch-22 situation. The already hostile relations between the USA, China and Russia mean Moscow and Beijing are pushing ahead with this revolutionary effort no matter what. If things get worse, they’ll simply double down on their sanctions-proofing efforts, taking more and more countries with them.

These innovations are increasingly giving countries the ability to conduct transactions through sanctions-proof channels. This trend appears irreversibleAll this means that within a decade, US unilateral sanctions may have very little bite.

It is all these developments, along with Moscow’s economic pivot eastwards after the 2014 Ukraine coup, and its move towards self-sufficiency in energy and food and in other vital resources, which account for the embarrassing failure of US-led sanctions against Russia. 

Western leaders, academics, journalists, pundits and economists promised when these sanctions were imposed that they would soon lead to Russia’s total political, economic and military isolation and collapse. They have not: They should get to grips with the new reality they inhabit in short order, though – for a multipolar world has begun to emerge in 2022, and it is here to stay.

How rapidly US elites are reckoning with the radically different reality in which they are now forced to operate is ironically underlined by how quickly the author of the Foreign Affairs article, Agathe Demarais, seems to have completely changed her tune on the subject of sanctions. On 1 December, less than a month earlier, she authored a piece for Foreign Policy – another US empire in-house journal – that offered a radically different take on the matter.

Boldly declaring sanctions on Russia are working in the headline, Demarais dismissed suggestions punitive Western measures were intended to force Putin to back down and pull out of Ukraine, or to provoke regime change in Moscow, or to prompt a Venezuela-style collapse of the Russian economy, despite the fact every single one of these outcomes was explicitly cited as a motivating factor behind the sanctions by Western officials, pundits, and journalists at the time.

Instead, she argued, sanctions were effective in the quest to send a message to the Kremlin that Europe and the United States are standing with Ukraine.

Whether or not Kyiv will be thrown under a bus by its Western backers in due course, and the anti-Russian measures will endure after the war is over, seems to not matter so much, though – for, as Demarais was herself forced to acknowledge less than four weeks later, the effectiveness of sanctions is rapidly diminishing. This speed of this about-face could well be an indication of how irresistibly the multipolar world is coming to be. You can share this story on social media.

Donate: It is the generosity of our supporters and members that makes our vital work possible. As the storm clouds of crisis and the pain of injustice and persecution loom over our people, the potential and importance of our work grows day-by-day. There is no George Soros figure out there for nationalists, so we can only do what good people like you help us to do. Thank you for your faith and your generous commitment: contact Michael Walsh

1 reply »

  1. I just have some difficulties with China who always played double game. China economic power was created by the same people who financed Stalin, Hitler and all other such regimes: mainly Wall street and city of London.

    The digital currency move is part of the globalists agenda to enslave us furthe rby removing cash, so I don’t think it’s a good move for people to use these currencies.

    Otherwise, this war in Ukraine is used as was used the FAKE PANDEMIC: to put people in fear and while they are busy being scared by that and the c CLIMATE SCAM, they don’t look at what is really going on in the background suchas:

    – WHO power grab with their bogus ‘apndemic treaty’
    – ‘climate’ lockdowns enforced without any democratic debate (called 15 mn cities)
    – Destruction of our communities, our health and environmant by installing without any debate thousands upon thousands of 5G towers and small cells —> used of suveillance but also huge explosion of health problems.
    – criminals pfizer and moedrna now modyfying coronaviruses to prepare thei next bio weapons
    etc.. etc..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s