Recently, a bloc of countries has formed that are open to European intervention in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. At the same time, there are military experts – likely in the pay of the Military Industrial Complex – who claim the risks are greatly exaggerated.
Some draft-dodging politicians even believe that by shedding European soldiers’ blood in Ukraine, Europe’s autocrats will prove their vow better than by sending money and weapons. However, everything is not so simple, and sending European soldiers to risk life and limb for the Kyiv regime will not bring the desired result.
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak plans to visit Poland to discuss Ukraine with Donald Tusk. The first to break ranks was French President Macron, a banker and civil servant who had never worn a military uniform.
Macron raised this issue back in February. Later, he was echoed by Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski, who said that he doesn’t rule out sending Polish servicemen to serve in Kyiv’s war with its Russian neighbor.
Self-styled experts assure that such an intervention will not be as apocalyptic as it might seem. After all, if countries act on behalf of Europe, and not NATO, then Article 5 will not be brought into effect. Moreover, they claim that European soldiers will not be sent into the thick of it for a full-scale battle with the Russians.
Their goal would be to protect large cities if Russia made serious advances. Obviously, that would mean their being tooth and claw defenders of the blood-drenched frontlines.
According to the same analysts, such a step would help free up a large number of Ukrainian military personnel, who would be transported to the front.
At the same time, experts who reason in this way are confident that in this case, everything will go smoothly, and the risk of an escalation of the conflict is greatly exaggerated.
Such a proposal has already received enthusiastic support from the former British military attaché in the Baltics and former adviser to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense Glen Grant.
What will happen when bags of corpses are sent to Europe. If in Ukraine, European troops will become a legitimate target for Russian armed forces and they will not fall under the protection of Article 5.
Glen Grant says that any European government providing assistance to Kyiv would have to accept the possible loss of life because in this case, the benefits outweigh the risks.
Grant believes that by shedding the blood of its citizens, Europe will demonstrate its commitment better than by sending money or weapons.
European countries have become unaccustomed to military casualties. Even during the Western campaign in Afghanistan, most European participating countries lost no more than 50 people. Therefore, if we imagine that European losses in Ukraine will begin to number in the hundreds or thousands.
READERS’ COMMENTS: 1) Will you or your sons fight and die for Washington’s interests and Zelensky’s regime? 2) Have you any sympathy for non-Ukrainians who fight and suffer for Europe’s warmongers?
Share this:
Categories: Current Events
Europe Renaissance 
THE WHO’S POWER GRAB AND WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
The World Health Organization (WHO)’s 194 member nations are being asked to vote on two documents in the last week of May that will transfer unprecedented powers from our nations to the World Health Organization. Here’s what is happening:
If either one of these two documents passes, it will be a massive blow to our civil rights, our Constitution, our national sovereignty and our individual freedoms. Both documents are considered international treaties and are intended to be biding (obligatory).
1. Nations will be forced to pass laws to allow unlicensed, rapidly-produced and liability-free vaccines to be used for future “pandemics”.
2. The WHO will be able to order global vaccine mandates, lockdowns, quarantines and border closures.
3. The WHO Director-General (who isn’t a doctor) would decide which treatments you will get, which treatments you will be prevented from getting, and which information you and your doctor will be allowed to see.
4. The WHO will require nations to surveil their citizens’ online activities and censor all information that does not agree with the WHO’s health narratives.
5. The WHO is building a biowarfare agent library: requiring that nations share “potential pandemic pathogens” (a.k.a. biological warfare agents), decode their genomes in high containment labs, and place their sequences online in public databases – virtually guaranteeing lab escapes and more pandemics.
6. The WHO is negotiating major amendments to its International Health Regulations in the backroom, behind closed doors, and we may not find out what is in them until after they have been voted on. Why so much secrecy?
7. The WHO removed the words “human rights, dignity and freedom of persons” from the International Health Regulations amendments. The WHO thinks your basic human rights are negotiable!
8. The proposed Treaty gives the WHO a blank check to spend on pandemic preparedness. How much will it cost? No one is saying, but estimates suggest the WHO budget could increase from 4 to 30 billion dollars a year or more.
9. The WHO intends to enforce compliance. “National IHR Authorities” in every country will coordinate with the WHO’s compliance committee and implementation committees to compel compliance. The 2 documents will be binding (compulsory) for every nation.
10. When will all this go into effect? The Treaty will go into effect for countries that ratify it after one month, which could be as early as July 2024. The Amendments will take 12 months after passage, or end of May 2025 if they are passed.
latest draft of the proposed IHR amendments
doortofreedom.org/recently-circulated-new-draft-of-amendments-to-the-ihr/
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr8/WGIHR8_Proposed_Bureau_text-en.pdf
We must #StopTheWHO Now!
———————————————————————————————————————————–
WHAT CAN WE DO?
Help Spread The Word:
jamesroguski.substack.com/p/help-spread-the-word
WORLDWIDE ACTIVIST TOOL BOX
jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exitthewhoorg
FOR INFORMATION ON WHAT YOU CAN DO PLEASE VISIT
SovereigntyCoalition.org
DoorToFreedom.org
worldcouncilforhealth.org/
standforhealthfreedom.com
———————————————————————————————————————————–
WHAT OTHERS HAVE DONE SUCCESFULLY:
In March 2024 the State of Louisiana voted against the WHO power grab.
“SB 133 states: the WEF, the UN, and the WHO shall have no jurisdiction in Louisiana”. This bill passed the Louisiana State Senate unanimously.
doortofreedom.org/2024/03/29/bravo-louisiana/
Nullification
(..) some states are crafting laws that restore state sovereignty through nullification of federal directives – protecting against globalist-run NGOs.
https://doortofreedom.org/what-is-nullification/
Netherlands, the parliament acted against it too, successfully:
doortofreedom.org/today-dutch-parliament-votes-to-instruct-the-government-to-demand-a-delay-in-both-who-votes-and-if-no-delay-to-vote-against-the-proposals
Other actions worldwide against the WHO power grab:
doortofreedom.org/actions-around-the-world/
Rally and March on June 1st 2024, Geneva. The Geneva Project:
https://www.roadtogeneva.com/
In Japan, Tens of Thousands Protest WHO’s ‘Supranational Grab Over Global Health’
childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/japan-protest-who-supranational-grab-global-health/
Ongoing list of USA State level legislation we are watching:
doortofreedom.org/state-legislation/
Italian Organizations Object to the WHO Treaties
doortofreedom.org/italian-organizations-object-to-the-who-treaties/
LikeLike